DROOMERS v. Parnell
772 N.W.2d 422, 485 Mich. 895
This text of 772 N.W.2d 422 (DROOMERS v. Parnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DROOMERS v. Parnell, 772 N.W.2d 422, 485 Mich. 895 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Barbara DROOMERS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Warren Droomers, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John R. PARNELL, Parnell & Associates, P.C., and Musilli, Baumgardner, Wagner & Parnell, P.C., Defendants, and
Ralph Musilli and Walter Baumgardner, Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion to supplement the record and to amend the statement of facts is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
772 N.W.2d 422, 485 Mich. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/droomers-v-parnell-mich-2009.