Home/Michigan Supreme Court/DROOMERS v. Parnell

DROOMERS v. Parnell

772 N.W.2d 422, 485 Mich. 895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DROOMERS v. Parnell. Read the opinion of the Court — 478 Mich. 902 →
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 2009·No. 138867·Published

Opinion

772 N.W.2d 422 (2009)

Barbara DROOMERS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Warren Droomers, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John R. PARNELL, Parnell & Associates, P.C., and Musilli, Baumgardner, Wagner & Parnell, P.C., Defendants, and
Ralph Musilli and Walter Baumgardner, Appellants.

Docket No. 138867. COA No. 278162.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 28, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement the record and to amend the statement of facts is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DROOMERS v. Parnell, 772 N.W.2d 422, 485 Mich. 895 (Mich. 2009).

772 N.W.2d 422 (DROOMERS v. Parnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.