Drooby v. Collins

281 A.D. 733, 117 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3370
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 733 (Drooby v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drooby v. Collins, 281 A.D. 733, 117 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendants Collins, and others, from an order of- the Special Term of the Supreme Court, Warren County, striking from the answer of the defendants the affirmative defense of the three-year Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prae. Act, § 49, subd. 6). The action is one for breach of warranty, to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received on or about September 23, 1946, as the result of the explosion of a bottle of ale purchased by the plaintiff from the defendants on or about that date. The action was commenced on March 31, 1951, more than three years but less than six years after the accrual of the cause of action. The court below correctly held that subdivision 6 of section 49 of the Civil Practice Act was not applicable since that subdivision applies only to actions for personal injury “ resulting from negligence.” The court further correctly held that the action was timely, under subdivision 3 of section 48 of the Civil Practice Act governing actions to recover for personal injury resulting from breach of an absolute obligation. This conclusion makes it unnecessary to consider the applicability of subdivision 1 of section 48 of the Civil Practice Act which allows six years for the commencement of an action brought upon “a contract obligation or liability express or implied” (cf. Buyers v. Buffalo Paint & Specialties, 199 Mise. 764; Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp., 279 App. Div. 806). Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Heffernan, J. P., Brewster, Bergan, Coon and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gile v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
281 A.D. 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 733, 117 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drooby-v-collins-nyappdiv-1952.