Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.

225 N.W.2d 546, 303 Minn. 534, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1565

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 24, 1975

DocketNo. 44915

StatusPublished

This text of 225 N.W.2d 546 (Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc., 225 N.W.2d 546, 303 Minn. 534, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1565 (Mich. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Certiorari was granted to review a denial of a request for reconsideration of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying employee’s petition to reopen the proceedings to take additional evidence.

There is ample justification to sustain the commission’s discretionary refusal to reopen the proceedings upon a determination that the additional evidence sought to be submitted on rehearing was neither new or significant nor unavailable at the time of the hearing on the merits.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Certiorari was granted to review a denial of a request for reconsideration of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying employee’s petition to reopen the proceedings to take additional evidence.

There is ample justification to sustain the commission’s discretionary refusal to reopen the proceedings upon a determination that the additional evidence sought to be submitted on rehearing was neither new or significant nor unavailable at the time of the hearing on the merits.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 N.W.2d 546, 303 Minn. 534, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dronen-v-snyders-drug-stores-inc-minn-1975.