Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.

225 N.W.2d 546, 303 Minn. 534, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1565

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 24, 1975·No. No. 44915·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Certiorari was granted to review a denial of a request for reconsideration of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying employee’s petition to reopen the proceedings to take additional evidence.

There is ample justification to sustain the commission’s discretionary refusal to reopen the proceedings upon a determination that the additional evidence sought to be submitted on rehearing was neither new or significant nor unavailable at the time of the hearing on the merits.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Certiorari was granted to review a denial of a request for reconsideration of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission denying employee’s petition to reopen the proceedings to take additional evidence.

There is ample justification to sustain the commission’s discretionary refusal to reopen the proceedings upon a determination that the additional evidence sought to be submitted on rehearing was neither new or significant nor unavailable at the time of the hearing on the merits.

Affirmed.

Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc., 225 N.W.2d 546, 303 Minn. 534, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1565 (Mich. 1975).

Pincite

225 N.W.2d 546 (Dronen v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.