Dron v. Beitscher

269 A.D.2d 557, 703 N.Y.S.2d 752, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2115

This text of 269 A.D.2d 557 (Dron v. Beitscher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dron v. Beitscher, 269 A.D.2d 557, 703 N.Y.S.2d 752, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated February 5, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There is an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained [558]*558a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Belmonte v Collins, 261 AD2d 496; Mariaca-Olmos v Mizrhy, 226 AD2d 437). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mariaca-Olmos v. Mizrhy
226 A.D.2d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Belmonte v. Collins
261 A.D.2d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 557, 703 N.Y.S.2d 752, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dron-v-beitscher-nyappdiv-2000.