Droin v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Droin v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 320, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1061

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 18, 1951

DocketNo. 55890; protests 169165-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 320 (Droin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Droin v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 320, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1061 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices, except as to entry 764394, covered by protest 143436-K, which was abandoned, should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2674, dated October 19, 1949.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices, except as to entry 764394, covered by protest 143436-K, which was abandoned, should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2674, dated October 19, 1949.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Cust. Ct. 320, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/droin-v-united-states-cusc-1951.