Droge v. Kuehn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Droge v. Kuehn

248 A.D. 756

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 756 (Droge v. Kuehn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Droge v. Kuehn, 248 A.D. 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by wife and husband — one to recover for injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of defendant; the other to recover for medical [757]*757expenses and loss of his wife’s services. Appeal from order denying, upon condition, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by wife and husband — one to recover for injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of defendant; the other to recover for medical [757]*757expenses and loss of his wife’s services. Appeal from order denying, upon condition, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/droge-v-kuehn-nyappdiv-1936.