Droege v. Security & Investment Corp. of the Palm Beaches
This text of 468 So. 2d 539 (Droege v. Security & Investment Corp. of the Palm Beaches) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find that neither Peoples Mortgage Company nor Security and Investment Corporation of the Palm Beaches were holders in due course; and that appellants’ defenses should have been tried or pled, together with any reply thereto by appellee, Security. We reverse and remand with direction to retry the case, considering appellants’ defenses and appellee’s reply thereto. The trial court may consider amendments to pleadings by either party upon remand, should either desire to have same considered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 So. 2d 539, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/droege-v-security-investment-corp-of-the-palm-beaches-fladistctapp-1985.