Droege v. Security & Investment Corp. of the Palm Beaches
468 So. 2d 539, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14195
Opinion
We find that neither Peoples Mortgage Company nor Security and Investment Corporation of the Palm Beaches were holders in due course; and that appellants’ defenses should have been tried or pled, together with any reply thereto by appellee, Security. We reverse and remand with direction to retry the case, considering appellants’ defenses and appellee’s reply thereto. The trial court may consider amendments to pleadings by either party upon remand, should either desire to have same considered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Droege v. Security & Investment Corp. of the Palm Beaches, 468 So. 2d 539, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
468 So. 2d 539 (Droege v. Security & Investment Corp. of the Palm Beaches) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Security & Investment Corp. of the Palm Beaches v. Droege
529 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
SECURITY & INV. CORP., PALM BEACHES v. Droege
529 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)