DROBOT v. Way
This text of 733 N.W.2d 18 (DROBOT v. Way) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Olena DROBOT and Robert Drobot, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Richard WAY and Wilma Way, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider whether so-called "black ice" constitutes a hazard that should be assessed in terms of traditional "open and obvious" jurisprudence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
733 N.W.2d 18, 478 Mich. 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drobot-v-way-mich-2007.