DROBOT v. Way
733 N.W.2d 18, 478 Mich. 914
Opinion
Olena DROBOT and Robert Drobot, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Richard WAY and Wilma Way, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider whether so-called "black ice" constitutes a hazard that should be assessed in terms of traditional "open and obvious" jurisprudence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DROBOT v. Way, 733 N.W.2d 18, 478 Mich. 914 (Mich. 2007).
733 N.W.2d 18 (DROBOT v. Way) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hall
733 N.W.2d 18 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)