Drivetime Car Sales, Inc. v. Orlando's Auto Specialists, Inc.

22 So. 3d 664, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16122, 2009 WL 3485977
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2009·No. No. 5D08-315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s decision to submit the civil theft claim to the jury. We also conclude that Appellee offered sufficient proof of the damages suffered as the result of the theft. The [665]*665cross-appeal is accordingly moot. The final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drivetime Car Sales, Inc. v. Orlando's Auto Specialists, Inc., 22 So. 3d 664, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16122, 2009 WL 3485977 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

22 So. 3d 664 (Drivetime Car Sales, Inc. v. Orlando's Auto Specialists, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.