Driver v. Tucker
613 So. 2d 145, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2193, 1993 WL 39657
Opinion
Appellants have appealed a nonfinal order denying their motion for preliminary injunction by which they sought to enforce their alleged right to a prescriptive easement. It appearing that Appellants failed to present sufficient proof to overcome the presumption of permission, the order is affirmed. City of Daytona Beach v. Tona-[146]*146Rama, Inc., 294 So.2d 73 (Fla.1974); Downing v. Bird, 100 So.2d 57 (Fla.1958).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Driver v. Tucker, 613 So. 2d 145, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2193, 1993 WL 39657 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
613 So. 2d 145 (Driver v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Downing v. Bird
100 So. 2d 57 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
City of Daytona Beach v. Tona-Rama, Inc.
294 So. 2d 73 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)