Driver v. Shellmar Products Co.

146 F.2d 110, 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2244
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1944·No. No. 9781·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After oral argument and upon consideration of briefs filed, it is ordered that the decree of the District Court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. It does not appear from the record that there has been an error of law or conclusion of fact unwarranted by evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Driver v. Shellmar Products Co., 146 F.2d 110, 63 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 360, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2244 (6th Cir. 1944).

146 F.2d 110 (Driver v. Shellmar Products Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.