Driver v. Hartman

31 S.E. 899, 96 Va. 518, 1898 Va. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedDecember 6, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 31 S.E. 899 (Driver v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Driver v. Hartman, 31 S.E. 899, 96 Va. 518, 1898 Va. LEXIS 125 (Va. 1898).

Opinion

Opinion by the court.

Hnder the rule applicable in the consideration of this case the verdict of the jury cannot be disturbed. Code, sec. 8484.

The first and second assignments of error touching the action of the court in refusing to allow witnesses to answer certain questions cannot be considered, because the bills of exception do not show what the defendant expected or proposed to prove by either witness. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Pollard, 94 Va. 146.

For these reasons the writ of error cannot be awarded.

Writ of error refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gosling v. Commonwealth
415 S.E.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1992)
Consumers Ice Co. v. Jennings
42 S.E. 879 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1902)
Brock v. Bear
42 S.E. 307 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1902)
Jackson v. Commonwealth
36 S.E. 487 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1900)
Stoneman v. Commonwealth
25 Va. 887 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 S.E. 899, 96 Va. 518, 1898 Va. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driver-v-hartman-va-1898.