Driver v. Hartman
This text of 31 S.E. 899 (Driver v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by the court.
Hnder the rule applicable in the consideration of this case the verdict of the jury cannot be disturbed. Code, sec. 8484.
The first and second assignments of error touching the action of the court in refusing to allow witnesses to answer certain questions cannot be considered, because the bills of exception do not show what the defendant expected or proposed to prove by either witness. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Pollard, 94 Va. 146.
For these reasons the writ of error cannot be awarded.
Writ of error refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 S.E. 899, 96 Va. 518, 1898 Va. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driver-v-hartman-va-1898.