Driver v. Bureau of Prisons

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2007·No. 07-6476·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6476

WILLIAM DRIVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARLY G. LAPIN, Director of BOP; DOCTOR MOUBAREK, Clinical Director; DOCTOR MORSHEAD, Chief Psychiatrist, in their official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-01904-WMN)

Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: July 11, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Driver, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Driver appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Driver v. Bureau of Prisons, No. 1:06-cv-01904-WMN (D. Md.

Feb. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Driver v. Bureau of Prisons, (4th Cir. 2007).

Driver v. Bureau of Prisons (Driver v. Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related