Driver Pipeline Company, Inc. v. Claudia Nino, Jesus Espinoza, Jr., Sylvia Espinoza, Jesus Medina Espinoza, Olivia Espinoza, Paula Wyatt, the Wyatt Law Firm

Opinion

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed March 3, 2020

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01409-CV

DRIVER PIPELINE COMPANY, INC., Appellant V.

CLAUDIA NINO, JESUS ESPINOZA, JR., SYLVIA ESPINOZA, JESUS MEDINA ESPINOZA, OLIVIA ESPINOZA, PAULA WYATT, AND THE WYATT LAW FIRM, Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-01630

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Whitehill, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Whitehill Seeking to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order denying its motion to reconsider the

dismissal of its claims against appellees under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a, appellant has

filed a petition for permissive appeal. We deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(f); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3, 42.3(a);

Bethel v. Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C., No. 18-0595, 2019 WL 8012729,

*3 (Tex. Feb. 21, 2020).

/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE

191409F.P05

S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DRIVER PIPELINE COMPANY, INC., On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-01630.

No. 05-19-01409-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill, Justices Molberg and Nowell participating.

CLAUDIA NINO, JESUS ESPINOZA, JR., SYLVIA ESPINOZA, JESUS MEDINA ESPINOZA, OLIVIA ESPINOZA, PAULA WYATT, AND THE WYATT LAW FIRM, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellees Claudia Nino, Jesus Espinoza, Jr., Sylvia Espinoza, Jesus Medina Espinoza, Olivia Espinoza, Paula Wyatt, and The Wyatt Law Firm recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Driver Pipeline Company, Inc.

Judgment entered March 3, 2020