Driver, C. v. Commonwealth
This text of Driver, C. v. Commonwealth (Driver, C. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
CLINTON DRIVER, : No. 49 EM 2022 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : THOMAS MCGINLEY AND HONORABLE : SCOTT DICLAUDIO, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2022, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Driver, C. v. Commonwealth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driver-c-v-commonwealth-pa-2022.