Driskell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Driskell v. State

89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 278, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 287

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 23, 1916

Docket7477

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 375 (Driskell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Driskell v. State, 89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 278, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 287 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Hodges, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for the offense of assault with intent to murder, and found guilty of assault and battery. The evidence in behalf of the State sustains the finding of the jury, and the evidence in behalf of the defendant justifies him. No error of law is complained of, and this court will not grant a new trial upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for the offense of assault with intent to murder, and found guilty of assault and battery. The evidence in behalf of the State sustains the finding of the jury, and the evidence in behalf of the defendant justifies him. No error of law is complained of, and this court will not grant a new trial upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 278, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driskell-v-state-gactapp-1916.