Driskell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Driskell v. State

89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 278, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 287

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 23, 1916·No. 7477·Published

Opinion

Hodges, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for the offense of assault with intent to murder, and found guilty of assault and battery. The evidence in behalf of the State sustains the finding of the jury, and the evidence in behalf of the defendant justifies him. No error of law is complained of, and this court will not grant a new trial upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hodges, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for the offense of assault with intent to murder, and found guilty of assault and battery. The evidence in behalf of the State sustains the finding of the jury, and the evidence in behalf of the defendant justifies him. No error of law is complained of, and this court will not grant a new trial upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Driskell v. State, 89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 278, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 287 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

89 S.E. 375 (Driskell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.