Driskal v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

95 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 777, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 517
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 19, 1918
Docket8617
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 268 (Driskal v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Driskal v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance, 95 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 777, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

A majority of the court is of the opinion that the record in this case and the opinion of the Supreme Court when the original • casé between these parties was before it (144 Ga. 534) show that-'the ■original petition filed by the plaintiff was dismissed on special demurrer; and therefore that the- merits of- the case have never been passed upon, and the court below, trying the case without the intervention of a jury, erred in sustaining the plea of res adjudicata and dismissing the petition. Papworth v. Fitzgerald, 111 Ga. 54 (36 S. E. 311). The writer is in doubt, but.concurs.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sparks & Hutson v. Fort
116 S.E. 227 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 268, 21 Ga. App. 777, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driskal-v-mutual-benefit-life-insurance-gactapp-1918.