Drisdel v. State

509 S.W.3d 860, 2017 WL 490452, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 115
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 2017·No. ED 103894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonardo Drisdel appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drisdel v. State, 509 S.W.3d 860, 2017 WL 490452, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

509 S.W.3d 860 (Drisdel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drisdel v. Lewis
E.D. Missouri, 2021