Drisdel v. State
509 S.W.3d 860, 2017 WL 490452, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 115
This text of 509 S.W.3d 860 (Drisdel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Drisdel v. State, 509 S.W.3d 860, 2017 WL 490452, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
ORDER
Leonardo Drisdel appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Drisdel v. Lewis
E.D. Missouri, 2021
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
509 S.W.3d 860, 2017 WL 490452, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drisdel-v-state-moctapp-2017.