Driscoll v. State

379 S.W.2d 909, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1025
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 17, 1964·No. No. 37051·Published

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $300.00.

No statement of facts accompanies the record on appeal. Appellant presents one formal bill of exception in which he complains of the action of the trial court in “permitting the result of a blood test to be introduced over the timely objection of the defendant, without proper predicate being laid by the State of Texas.” In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to pass upon the admission of testimony over the objection of appellant. Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 378 S.W.2d 325, and Fletcher v. State, 162 Tex.Cr. R. 100, 282 S.W.2d 230.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Driscoll v. State, 379 S.W.2d 909, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1025 (Tex. 1964).

379 S.W.2d 909 (Driscoll v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
378 S.W.2d 325 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Fletcher v. State
282 S.W.2d 230 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)