Driscoll v. State
This text of 379 S.W.2d 909 (Driscoll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $300.00.
No statement of facts accompanies the record on appeal. Appellant presents one formal bill of exception in which he complains of the action of the trial court in “permitting the result of a blood test to be introduced over the timely objection of the defendant, without proper predicate being laid by the State of Texas.” In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to pass upon the admission of testimony over the objection of appellant. Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 378 S.W.2d 325, and Fletcher v. State, 162 Tex.Cr. R. 100, 282 S.W.2d 230.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
379 S.W.2d 909, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driscoll-v-state-texcrimapp-1964.