Driscoll v. Sharp

711 So. 2d 573, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14462, 1997 WL 817990
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 1997
DocketNo. 97-01842
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 So. 2d 573 (Driscoll v. Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Driscoll v. Sharp, 711 So. 2d 573, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14462, 1997 WL 817990 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Dan Driscoll challenges the circuit court’s order dismissing his legal malpractice action for lack of prosecution. The order suggested that the court believed it lacked discretion in the matter. That is not so. Whether a party has shown good cause to avoid dismissal for lack of prosecution is a decision committed to the sound discretion of the court. See Edgecumbe v. American General Corp., 613 So.2d 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Therefore, we reverse and remand for the circuit court to reconsider its decision in light of its discretion.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FICARROTTA, GASPER, J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Casner
825 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 So. 2d 573, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14462, 1997 WL 817990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driscoll-v-sharp-fladistctapp-1997.