Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway
51 A. 904, 71 N.H. 619, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 93
This text of 51 A. 904 (Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway, 51 A. 904, 71 N.H. 619, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 93 (N.H. 1902).
Opinion
The defendants do not contend that the courts of this state cannot entertain jurisdiction of the action, but say it is within their discretion whether they will do so or not. If so, the question is one of fact rather than of law, and should be decided in the superior court.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Running v. Southwest Freight Lines, Inc.
303 S.W.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 A. 904, 71 N.H. 619, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driscoll-v-portsmouth-kittery-york-street-railway-nh-1902.