Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway
51 A. 904, 71 N.H. 619, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 93
Opinion
The defendants do not contend that the courts of this state cannot entertain jurisdiction of the action, but say it is within their discretion whether they will do so or not. If so, the question is one of fact rather than of law, and should be decided in the superior court.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway, 51 A. 904, 71 N.H. 619, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 93 (N.H. 1902).
51 A. 904 (Driscoll v. Portsmouth, Kittery & York Street Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Running v. Southwest Freight Lines, Inc.
303 S.W.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1957)