Driscoll v. Hoard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Driscoll v. Hoard

169 A.D. 910, 153 N.Y.S. 1112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 169 A.D. 910 (Driscoll v. Hoard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Driscoll v. Hoard, 169 A.D. 910, 153 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered in favor of plaintiff vacated and set aside. Judgment and order, appealed from reversed and'motion for new trial-granted,'with Costs to the appellant to abide event, "Held, that the evidence was sufficient to make out a case for the jury; that the trial [911]*911court properly decided that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and should have awarded a new trial instead of granting the nonsuit after taking the verdict of the jury. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered in favor of plaintiff vacated and set aside. Judgment and order, appealed from reversed and'motion for new trial-granted,'with Costs to the appellant to abide event, "Held, that the evidence was sufficient to make out a case for the jury; that the trial [911]*911court properly decided that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and should have awarded a new trial instead of granting the nonsuit after taking the verdict of the jury. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D. 910, 153 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driscoll-v-hoard-nyappdiv-1915.