Driscoll v. Delarosa
57 A.D.3d 317, 868 N.Y.2d 529
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 2008·Published
Opinion
An order declining to sign an order to show cause is not appealable (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Heath v Wojtowicz, 48 AD3d 214 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 708 [2008]). We would add that to the extent plaintiff seeks damages against the State, Supreme Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction (Court of Claims Act §§ 8, 9; Pollicina v Misericordia Hosp. Med. Ctr., 82 NY2d 332, 339 n 3 [1993]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Nardelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Driscoll v. Delarosa, 57 A.D.3d 317, 868 N.Y.2d 529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 317 (Driscoll v. Delarosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pollicina v. Misericordia Hospital Medical Center
624 N.E.2d 974 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Heath v. Wojtowicz
48 A.D.3d 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)