Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Driscoll v. Delarosa

Driscoll v. Delarosa

57 A.D.3d 317, 868 N.Y.2d 529
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.3d 317 (Driscoll v. Delarosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Driscoll v. Delarosa, 57 A.D.3d 317, 868 N.Y.2d 529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

An order declining to sign an order to show cause is not appealable (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Heath v Wojtowicz, 48 AD3d 214 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 708 [2008]). We would add that to the extent plaintiff seeks damages against the State, Supreme Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction (Court of Claims Act §§ 8, 9; Pollicina v Misericordia Hosp. Med. Ctr., 82 NY2d 332, 339 n 3 [1993]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Nardelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pollicina v. Misericordia Hospital Medical Center
624 N.E.2d 974 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Heath v. Wojtowicz
48 A.D.3d 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 317, 868 N.Y.2d 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driscoll-v-delarosa-nyappdiv-2008.