Driscol v. State

140 S.E. 925, 37 Ga. App. 486, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 358
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1927
Docket18489
StatusPublished

This text of 140 S.E. 925 (Driscol v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Driscol v. State, 140 S.E. 925, 37 Ga. App. 486, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 358 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and the motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. E. L. Stephens, Stephens & Kea,, for plaintiff in error. Fred Kea,, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 925, 37 Ga. App. 486, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driscol-v-state-gactapp-1927.