Drips Holdings, LLC v. Teledrip LLC
This text of Drips Holdings, LLC v. Teledrip LLC (Drips Holdings, LLC v. Teledrip LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
DRIPS HOLDINGS, LLC, ) CASE NO. 5:19-cv-02789 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) vs. ) ) TELEDRIP, LLC, et al, ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) AND ORDER ) ) DEFENDANT. )
On December 7, 2021, the Magistrate Judge in this matter submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 124) recommending the denial of Plaintiff’s (“Drips”) motion for leave to amend its complaint (Doc. 109). Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days of service. No objections have been filed. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. Drips’ motion for leave to amend its complaint is DENIED.
Dated: January 3, 2022 /s/ John R. Adams JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Drips Holdings, LLC v. Teledrip LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drips-holdings-llc-v-teledrip-llc-ohnd-2022.