Driggs v. City of New York
76 N.Y.S. 1012
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
There being no appeal by the defendant, the question whether or not, under section 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the limit of $500 is intended to in-[1013]*1013elude all allowances for incidental expenses, etc., is not before the court. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Driggs v. City of New York, 76 N.Y.S. 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).
76 N.Y.S. 1012 (Driggs v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Monfort
79 N.Y.S. 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)