Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Driggers v. State

Driggers v. State

935 So. 2d 1230, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13436, 2006 WL 2347323
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Driggers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 917 So. 2d 329 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 2006·No. No. 5D05-3554·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See § 812.022(2), Fla. Stat. (2001) (providing that “[pjroof of possession of property recently stolen, unless satisfactorily explained, gives rise to an inference that the person in possession of the property knew or should have known that the property had been stolen”).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Driggers v. State, 935 So. 2d 1230, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13436, 2006 WL 2347323 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

935 So. 2d 1230 (Driggers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.