Driggers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Driggers v. State

538 So. 2d 515, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 389, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 579, 1989 WL 9142

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1989

DocketNo. 88-1062

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 538 So. 2d 515 (Driggers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Driggers v. State, 538 So. 2d 515, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 389, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 579, 1989 WL 9142 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion to suppress. The record supports the conclusion that the defendant consented to the search of his bag. He not only authorized the officers to look into the bag, but also to “feel around” inside it. One of the officers examined the bag and immediately felt the wrapped packages containing cocaine concealed in the defendant’s sock. The testimony reflects that one end of the package was exposed so that the officer could see the drugs without unwrapping the package. We therefore need not consider defendant’s argument that State v. Wells, 13 F.L.W. 686 (Fla. Dec. 1, 1988), should be applied to closed packages uncovered in a luggage search.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion to suppress. The record supports the conclusion that the defendant consented to the search of his bag. He not only authorized the officers to look into the bag, but also to “feel around” inside it. One of the officers examined the bag and immediately felt the wrapped packages containing cocaine concealed in the defendant’s sock. The testimony reflects that one end of the package was exposed so that the officer could see the drugs without unwrapping the package. We therefore need not consider defendant’s argument that State v. Wells, 13 F.L.W. 686 (Fla. Dec. 1, 1988), should be applied to closed packages uncovered in a luggage search.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 So. 2d 515, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 389, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 579, 1989 WL 9142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driggers-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack