Driggers v. City of Florence

2 S.E.2d 790, 190 S.C. 309, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 11, 1939
Docket14879
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2 S.E.2d 790 (Driggers v. City of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Driggers v. City of Florence, 2 S.E.2d 790, 190 S.C. 309, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 36 (S.C. 1939).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

We have read with care the testimony in this case, and are satisfied that the conclusions reached by the trial Judge are correct.

For the reasons stated in his order of nonsuit, therefore, which will be reported, the judgment of the Court below is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Fisi-iburne and Mr. Acting Associate Justice H. F. Rice concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gause v. Smithers
742 S.E.2d 644 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)
Roddey v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
732 S.E.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2012)
Shepard v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
385 S.E.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1989)
Tucker v. United States
385 F. Supp. 717 (D. South Carolina, 1974)
Wyatt v. Greenville County
174 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)
Floyd v. Town of Lake City
99 S.E.2d 181 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Crosby v. City of Chester
14 S.E.2d 552 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.E.2d 790, 190 S.C. 309, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/driggers-v-city-of-florence-sc-1939.