Driggers v. City of Florence
2 S.E.2d 790, 190 S.C. 309, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 36
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
We have read with care the testimony in this case, and are satisfied that the conclusions reached by the trial Judge are correct.
For the reasons stated in his order of nonsuit, therefore, which will be reported, the judgment of the Court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Driggers v. City of Florence, 2 S.E.2d 790, 190 S.C. 309, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 36 (S.C. 1939).
2 S.E.2d 790 (Driggers v. City of Florence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Untitled Case
D. South Carolina, 2026
Untitled Case
D. South Carolina, 2026
Gause v. Smithers
742 S.E.2d 644 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)
Roddey v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
732 S.E.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2012)
Woven Electronics Corporation v. The Advance Group, Incorporated, D/B/A Advance Wire & Cable, Woven Electronics Corporation v. The Advance Group, Incorporated, D/B/A Advance Wire & Cable
930 F.2d 913 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)
Shepard v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
385 S.E.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1989)
Tucker v. United States
385 F. Supp. 717 (D. South Carolina, 1974)
Wyatt v. Greenville County
174 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)
Floyd v. Town of Lake City
99 S.E.2d 181 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Crosby v. City of Chester
14 S.E.2d 552 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)