Drier v. United States

103 Ct. Cl. 739, 1945 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 57, 1945 WL 4027
United States Court of Claims·Decided April 2, 1945·No. No. 45601·Published

Opinion

[740] The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion per ewriam,, as follows:

Per Curiam:

The facts in this case are not in dispute- and show conclusively that plaintiff’s mother was dependent upon hfm for her chief support during the period involved. Plaintiff is entitled to recover. Entry of judgment will be suspended pending the filing of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due in accordance with the foregoing special findings of facts and the opinion. Mumma v. United States, 99 C. Cls. 261; Herrick v. United States, 100 C. Cls. 308.

Upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with the above [741] opinion to be $1,128.80, and upon plaintiff’s motion for judgment, it was ordered June 4, 1945, that judgment be-entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,128.80.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drier v. United States, 103 Ct. Cl. 739, 1945 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 57, 1945 WL 4027 (cc 1945).

103 Ct. Cl. 739 (Drier v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mumma v. United States
99 Ct. Cl. 261 (Court of Claims, 1943)
Herrick v. United States
100 Ct. Cl. 308 (Court of Claims, 1943)