Drier v. United States

Court of Claims

Drier v. United States

103 Ct. Cl. 739, 1945 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 57, 1945 WL 4027

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 2, 1945

DocketNo. 45601

StatusPublished

This text of 103 Ct. Cl. 739 (Drier v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drier v. United States, 103 Ct. Cl. 739, 1945 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 57, 1945 WL 4027 (cc 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

[740]*740The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion per ewriam,, as follows:

Per Curiam:

The facts in this case are not in dispute- and show conclusively that plaintiff’s mother was dependent upon hfm for her chief support during the period involved. Plaintiff is entitled to recover. Entry of judgment will be suspended pending the filing of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due in accordance with the foregoing special findings of facts and the opinion. Mumma v. United States, 99 C. Cls. 261; Herrick v. United States, 100 C. Cls. 308.

Upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with the above [741]*741opinion to be $1,128.80, and upon plaintiff’s motion for judgment, it was ordered June 4, 1945, that judgment be-entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,128.80.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[740]*740The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover in an opinion per ewriam,, as follows:

Per Curiam:

The facts in this case are not in dispute- and show conclusively that plaintiff’s mother was dependent upon hfm for her chief support during the period involved. Plaintiff is entitled to recover. Entry of judgment will be suspended pending the filing of a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due in accordance with the foregoing special findings of facts and the opinion. Mumma v. United States, 99 C. Cls. 261; Herrick v. United States, 100 C. Cls. 308.

Upon a report from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due plaintiff in accordance with the above [741]*741opinion to be $1,128.80, and upon plaintiff’s motion for judgment, it was ordered June 4, 1945, that judgment be-entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,128.80.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 Ct. Cl. 739, 1945 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 57, 1945 WL 4027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drier-v-united-states-cc-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack