Dribbon v. New York State Education Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dribbon v. New York State Education Department

78 A.D.2d 914, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13675

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 914 (Dribbon v. New York State Education Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dribbon v. New York State Education Department, 78 A.D.2d 914, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Education, which suspended petitioner’s license to practice podiatry for a period of three months and imposed a fine of $1,000. Petitioner’s contention that the penalty imposed is disproportionate to the offense and shocking to one’s sense of fairness is without merit (see Matter of Foreman v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 75 AD2d 953, mot for lv to app den 51 NY2d 704). We have examined petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be unpersuasive. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Education, which suspended petitioner’s license to practice podiatry for a period of three months and imposed a fine of $1,000. Petitioner’s contention that the penalty imposed is disproportionate to the offense and shocking to one’s sense of fairness is without merit (see Matter of Foreman v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 75 AD2d 953, mot for lv to app den 51 NY2d 704). We have examined petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be unpersuasive. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 914, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dribbon-v-new-york-state-education-department-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack