Dribben v. Dribben

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dribben v. Dribben

279 A.D. 599, 107 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3147

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1951·Published

Opinion

In our opinion, the facts established by plaintiff were insufficient to warrant a judgment of separation on any of the grounds set forth in section 1161 of the Civil Practice Act. (Cf. Smith v. Smith, 273 N. Y. 380; Pearson v. Pearson, 230 N. Y. 141, 148, and Umbach v. Umbach, 183 App. Div. 495.) No formal findings of fact were made below. The findings of fact contained in the trial court’s decision are affirmed, except insofar as the court may have found that the “ defendant in effect told the plaintiff to leave him ”; and this court finds that such a demand was not made by defendant, nor may it reasonably be inferred from the testimony. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In our opinion, the facts established by plaintiff were insufficient to warrant a judgment of separation on any of the grounds set forth in section 1161 of the Civil Practice Act. (Cf. Smith v. Smith, 273 N. Y. 380; Pearson v. Pearson, 230 N. Y. 141, 148, and Umbach v. Umbach, 183 App. Div. 495.) No formal findings of fact were made below. The findings of fact contained in the trial court’s decision are affirmed, except insofar as the court may have found that the “ defendant in effect told the plaintiff to leave him ”; and this court finds that such a demand was not made by defendant, nor may it reasonably be inferred from the testimony. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Dribben v. Dribben, 279 A.D. 599, 107 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

279 A.D. 599 (Dribben v. Dribben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related