Dreyfuss v. Giles

21 P. 840, 79 Cal. 409, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 741
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1889
DocketNo. 12430
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 21 P. 840 (Dreyfuss v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dreyfuss v. Giles, 21 P. 840, 79 Cal. 409, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 741 (Cal. 1889).

Opinion

Works, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. The complaint alleges the death of the mortgagor, the settlement of the estate, the distribution of the mortgaged property to his daughter, an only heir, and the sale of the mortgaged property by her to the defendants in this action. It is also averred in the complaint that the mortgage was not due at the time the estate was closed, and final distribution made, and was not presented as a claim against the estate. The complaint expressly waives all claims against any other property of the estate except the lands described in the mortgage. In their answer, the defendants plead the settlement and final distribution of the estate as a bar to the plaintiff’s right to recover, and this is the only question made on this appeal.

• It was not necessary for the plaintiffs to present their mortgage as a claim against the estate, and their failure to do so, and the settlement and distribution of the estate, was no bar to their right to foreclose the mortgage. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1500; Security Savings Bank v. Connell, 65 Cal. 574.)

It is evident the appeal in this case was taken for delay.

[411]*411Order and judgment appealed from affirmed, with ten per cent damages.

Beatty, C. J., Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., and Thornton, J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corporation of America v. Marks
73 P.2d 1215 (California Supreme Court, 1937)
Berry v. Scott
255 P. 305 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1927)
Martin v. Saxton
160 P. 441 (Utah Supreme Court, 1916)
Fawcett v. McGahan-mckee Lumber Co.
1913 OK 97 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp. v. Nadeau
27 P. 302 (California Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 P. 840, 79 Cal. 409, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dreyfuss-v-giles-cal-1889.