Dreyfus v. Lutz Co.
146 A. 913, 106 N.J.L. 566, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 191
This text of 146 A. 913 (Dreyfus v. Lutz Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dreyfus v. Lutz Co., 146 A. 913, 106 N.J.L. 566, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 191 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 567
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Streng's Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Galasso
191 A. 874 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 A. 913, 106 N.J.L. 566, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dreyfus-v-lutz-co-nj-1929.