Dreyfus v. Lutz Co.
146 A. 913, 106 N.J.L. 566, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 191
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 567
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dreyfus v. Lutz Co., 146 A. 913, 106 N.J.L. 566, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 191 (N.J. 1929).
146 A. 913 (Dreyfus v. Lutz Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Streng's Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Galasso
191 A. 874 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)