Dreyfus Ashby & Co. v. United States
This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 378 (Dreyfus Ashby & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the one carton of liquor reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon the one carton of liquor, which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Cust. Ct. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dreyfus-ashby-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.