Dreyer v. Twitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dreyer v. Twitchell

259 A.D. 846, 19 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6952

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 846 (Dreyer v. Twitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dreyer v. Twitchell, 259 A.D. 846, 19 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion (a) for an order under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or, in the alternative, (b) for an order under rule 90, Rules of Civil Practice, requiring plaintiff separately to state and number each of the causes of action attempted to be pleaded in the complaint; or also in the alternative, (c) for an order under rule 102, Rules of Civil Practice, requiring plaintiff to make the complaint more definite and certain; or further in the alternative, (d) for an order under rule 103, Rules of Civil Practice, striking out certain portions of the complaint as sham, frivolous, irrelevant and redundant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendant’s time to answer is extended until ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion (a) for an order under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or, in the alternative, (b) for an order under rule 90, Rules of Civil Practice, requiring plaintiff separately to state and number each of the causes of action attempted to be pleaded in the complaint; or also in the alternative, (c) for an order under rule 102, Rules of Civil Practice, requiring plaintiff to make the complaint more definite and certain; or further in the alternative, (d) for an order under rule 103, Rules of Civil Practice, striking out certain portions of the complaint as sham, frivolous, irrelevant and redundant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendant’s time to answer is extended until ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 846, 19 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dreyer-v-twitchell-nyappdiv-1940.