Dreyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Dreyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

508 So. 2d 210, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 11265

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 8, 1987

DocketNo. 87-564

StatusPublished

This text of 508 So. 2d 210 (Dreyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dreyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 508 So. 2d 210, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 11265 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY:

The trial court erred in denying Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois’ (Reliance) motion for summary judgment. Reliance’s policy insured certain specifically described vehicles owned by Hydraulic Well Control, Inc. At the time of the accident Dreyer was occupying a vehicle owned by Red Adair, Inc. There is no question of fact that under the circumstances Dreyer was not occupying a “covered auto”, and he is not a named or omnibus insured under the Reliance policy. The trial court is ORDERED to vacate and set aside its judgment denying Reliance’s motion for summary judgment, and IT IS ORDERED that the trial court grant Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois’ motion for summary judgment dismissing Reliance from the suit with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY:

The trial court erred in denying Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois’ (Reliance) motion for summary judgment. Reliance’s policy insured certain specifically described vehicles owned by Hydraulic Well Control, Inc. At the time of the accident Dreyer was occupying a vehicle owned by Red Adair, Inc. There is no question of fact that under the circumstances Dreyer was not occupying a “covered auto”, and he is not a named or omnibus insured under the Reliance policy. The trial court is ORDERED to vacate and set aside its judgment denying Reliance’s motion for summary judgment, and IT IS ORDERED that the trial court grant Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois’ motion for summary judgment dismissing Reliance from the suit with prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

508 So. 2d 210, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 11265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dreyer-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-lactapp-1987.