Drexler v. Koza
This text of 156 F.2d 370 (Drexler v. Koza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The points presented in this appeal are, in our opinion, purely questions of fact. The chief one of these is whether one or the other witness, upon whose testimony the outcome of the lawsuit depended, was telling the truth. The appellants say the trial judge should have answered the question contrary to the way he did answer it. The conclusion upon the question of credibility is peculiarly one for the trier of the fact. Upon this and the other issues of fact there is ample testimony to support the conclusion of the District Judge and we cannot say that his conclusion was clearly erroneous.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 F.2d 370, 71 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drexler-v-koza-ca3-1946.