Drexler v. Clonen
This text of 254 A.D.2d 388 (Drexler v. Clonen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated February 3, 1998, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017; Feinman v Mennan Oil Co., 248 AD2d 503; Parker v Defontaine-Stratton, 231 AD2d 412; Rut v Grigonis, 214 AD2d 721). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D.2d 388, 678 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drexler-v-clonen-nyappdiv-1998.