Drexler-Rochester Properties, Inc. v. Paris
235 A.D. 892
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Drexler-Rochester Properties, Inc. v. Paris. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 A.D. 409 →
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that none of the information sought to be obtained by the notice appears to be material to the proof of the cause of action against Paris, and that as to Katsampes it would be immaterial because they did not sign the contract under seal upon which the complaint rests. (Crowley v. Lewis, 239 N. Y. 264.) All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drexler-Rochester Properties, Inc. v. Paris, 235 A.D. 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 892 (Drexler-Rochester Properties, Inc. v. Paris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowley v. Lewis
146 N.E. 374 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)