Drexel v. Northwestern Terra Cotta Co.
70 F. 219, 16 C.C.A. 678, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 1895
DocketNo. 483
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 70 F. 219 (Drexel v. Northwestern Terra Cotta Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Drexel v. Northwestern Terra Cotta Co., 70 F. 219, 16 C.C.A. 678, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493 (8th Cir. 1895).
Opinion
In this case the suit was on the same bond that was sued oil, in Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. Hulbert (No. 475) 70 Fed. 209, but the lower court in tills case rendered judgment for the plaintiff upon the ground that it was named as the obligee in the bond. On the authority of Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. Hulbert, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Rosatto
165 F. 56 (Third Circuit, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 F. 219, 16 C.C.A. 678, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drexel-v-northwestern-terra-cotta-co-ca8-1895.