Drewbar Realty Co. v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Drewbar Realty Co. v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal

181 A.D.2d 617, 581 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4023

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 617 (Drewbar Realty Co. v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drewbar Realty Co. v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 181 A.D.2d 617, 581 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.), entered February 27, 1991, which dismissed petitioner’s CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul respondent’s determination calculating the lawful rent for the subject apartment in accordance with its section 42 (A) default formula, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS court that petitioner’s failure to provide leases for 1974 to 1977 as requested by respondent left respondent without a complete rent history, and gave it reason to utilize its default formula in calculating the rent for the subject apartment. In Matter of Lavanant v State Div. of [618]*618Hous. & Community Renewal (148 AD2d 185, 192), this court specifically upheld respondent’s policy of requiring apartment owners to furnish a complete rent history in all rent overcharge proceedings commenced prior to April 1, 1984. In addition, this court and the Court of Appeals have upheld the use of alternative formulas in calculating the lawful rent where owners have failed to produce the required rent history (Matter of 61 Jane St. Assocs. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 108 AD2d 636, affd 65 NY2d 898).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.), entered February 27, 1991, which dismissed petitioner’s CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul respondent’s determination calculating the lawful rent for the subject apartment in accordance with its section 42 (A) default formula, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS court that petitioner’s failure to provide leases for 1974 to 1977 as requested by respondent left respondent without a complete rent history, and gave it reason to utilize its default formula in calculating the rent for the subject apartment. In Matter of Lavanant v State Div. of [618]*618Hous. & Community Renewal (148 AD2d 185, 192), this court specifically upheld respondent’s policy of requiring apartment owners to furnish a complete rent history in all rent overcharge proceedings commenced prior to April 1, 1984. In addition, this court and the Court of Appeals have upheld the use of alternative formulas in calculating the lawful rent where owners have failed to produce the required rent history (Matter of 61 Jane St. Assocs. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 108 AD2d 636, affd 65 NY2d 898).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 617, 581 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drewbar-realty-co-v-state-of-new-york-division-of-housing-community-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack