Drew v. State
This text of 440 S.E.2d 82 (Drew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant Drew appeals his conviction of two counts of felony obstruction of a law enforcement officer. Held:
The sole enumeration of error maintains that the trial court erred [689]*689in failing to charge the jury, or defense counsel was ineffective in failing to request a charge to the jury, on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor obstruction of a law enforcement officer. The misdemeanor obstruction offense does not contain the element of “violence” as does the felony offense. Williams v. State, 196 Ga. App. 154, 156 (1) (395 SE2d 399). However, under the evidence presented at trial any obstruction of the officers was by means of “violence,” and defendant was either guilty of the felony or innocent of any crime. Under these circumstances the trial court did not err in refusing to charge on misdemeanor obstruction and defense counsel was not remiss in failing to request such a charge. Coker v. State, 207 Ga. App. 482, 484 (4) (428 SE2d 578); Dickerson v. State, 207 Ga. App. 241 (1) (427 SE2d 591); Hogan v. State, 205 Ga. App. 637, 638 (2) (423 SE2d 47); Love v. State, 194 Ga. App. 601, 603 (4) (391 SE2d 447).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 S.E.2d 82, 211 Ga. App. 688, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 273, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drew-v-state-gactapp-1994.