Drew v. Hagy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Drew v. Hagy

216 S.E.2d 676, 134 Ga. App. 852, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2193

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 15, 1975

Docket50456

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 216 S.E.2d 676 (Drew v. Hagy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drew v. Hagy, 216 S.E.2d 676, 134 Ga. App. 852, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2193 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this case plaintiff served interrogatories on defendant. Fifty-six days after service defendant answered some and specifically objected to six of those unanswered. Defendant sought no extension of time in which to answer or object. Plaintiff filed a motion to compel answers. The trial court sustained the objections to the six interrogatories and ordered defendant to answer the balance. Plaintiff appeals from this order under a certificate for immediate review. Held:

CPA § 33 (a) requires that answers and objections are to be served within 30 days after service of the interrogatories except that a defendant cannot be required to serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint on him. (Code Ann. § 81A-133 (a)). Failure to file timely objections to the interrogatories is a waiver of the right to object. Aetna Life Ins. v. Greene, 116 Ga. App. 783, 788 (159 SE2d 87); Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 2173. Thus the defendant waived his right to object and the trial court had no alternative but to grant plaintiffs motion to compel answers to all interrogatories. It was error to sustain the objections to the six interrogatories and not order them answered. We reverse with direction that the trial court enter an order compelling defendant to answer all interrogatories.

Reversed with direction.

Webb and Marhsall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this case plaintiff served interrogatories on defendant. Fifty-six days after service defendant answered some and specifically objected to six of those unanswered. Defendant sought no extension of time in which to answer or object. Plaintiff filed a motion to compel answers. The trial court sustained the objections to the six interrogatories and ordered defendant to answer the balance. Plaintiff appeals from this order under a certificate for immediate review. Held:

CPA § 33 (a) requires that answers and objections are to be served within 30 days after service of the interrogatories except that a defendant cannot be required to serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint on him. (Code Ann. § 81A-133 (a)). Failure to file timely objections to the interrogatories is a waiver of the right to object. Aetna Life Ins. v. Greene, 116 Ga. App. 783, 788 (159 SE2d 87); Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 2173. Thus the defendant waived his right to object and the trial court had no alternative but to grant plaintiffs motion to compel answers to all interrogatories. It was error to sustain the objections to the six interrogatories and not order them answered. We reverse with direction that the trial court enter an order compelling defendant to answer all interrogatories.

Reversed with direction.

Webb and Marhsall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 S.E.2d 676, 134 Ga. App. 852, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drew-v-hagy-gactapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack