Drew v. Farr
210 N.W. 608, 169 Minn. 62
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 29, 1926
DocketNo. 25,503.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 210 N.W. 608 (Drew v. Farr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Drew v. Farr, 210 N.W. 608, 169 Minn. 62 (Mich. 1926).
Opinion
Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The case involves the same question, and none other, considered in Kozisek v. Brigham, supra, page 57. That decision controls this case and requires an affirmance of the order under review.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pabón Escabí v. Axtmayer
90 P.R. 20 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)
Garceau v. Engel
210 N.W. 624 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
210 N.W. 608, 169 Minn. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drew-v-farr-minn-1926.