Drew v. Farr
210 N.W. 608, 169 Minn. 62
Opinion
Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The case involves the same question, and none other, considered in Kozisek v. Brigham, supra, page 57. That decision controls this case and requires an affirmance of the order under review.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drew v. Farr, 210 N.W. 608, 169 Minn. 62 (Mich. 1926).
210 N.W. 608 (Drew v. Farr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pabón Escabí v. Axtmayer
90 P.R. 20 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)
Garceau v. Engel
210 N.W. 624 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)