Drew v. Coleman
This text of 165 A.D. 966 (Drew v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from should be modified as follows, and as so modified affirmed, without costs: Subdivision 1. Stricken out. Subdivision 2. Amended so as to'read as follows: “Whether or not it is intended to be alleged that this defendant or the board of directors of which he was a member received any part of the amount referred to in Paragraph Twenty-fifth of the complaint as ‘ various, sums aggregating five and a half million dollars.’ ” Subdivision 8. Strike out the last nine words thereof: “ and if a part, what amount was so received.” Subdivision 4. Strike out the last twenty-six words thereof: “and if a part of said sum, what amount is alleged to have so disappeared, and; if so, of what said wrongful acts or negligence consisted.” Subdivision 5. Strike out the words: “and in what transaction or transactions.” Subdivision 6. Strike out the words: “and if a part, what part.” Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 A.D. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drew-v-coleman-nyappdiv-1914.