Drew National Leasing Corp. v. J. D. Ball Ford, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Drew National Leasing Corp. v. J. D. Ball Ford, Inc.

220 So. 2d 666, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6087

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 1969

DocketNo. 68-798

StatusPublished

This text of 220 So. 2d 666 (Drew National Leasing Corp. v. J. D. Ball Ford, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drew National Leasing Corp. v. J. D. Ball Ford, Inc., 220 So. 2d 666, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff brings this appeal from a judgment for the defendant after a non-jury trial. The record reveals conflicting testimony, and the finder of fact has resolved these conflicts against the appellant. Upon such a record the appellant court will not interfere with the judgment absent a showing that harmful error has been committed. Cf. Dade Engineering & Construction Co. v. D’Amato, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 627.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff brings this appeal from a judgment for the defendant after a non-jury trial. The record reveals conflicting testimony, and the finder of fact has resolved these conflicts against the appellant. Upon such a record the appellant court will not interfere with the judgment absent a showing that harmful error has been committed. Cf. Dade Engineering & Construction Co. v. D’Amato, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 627.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 So. 2d 666, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drew-national-leasing-corp-v-j-d-ball-ford-inc-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack