Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

N.D. California

Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

DecidedJanuary 25, 2021

Docket4:18-cv-03748

StatusUnknown

This text of Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TATYANA DREVALEVA, Case No. 21-cv-00500-JCS Also Filed in Case No. 18-cv-03748-WHA Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 9 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

10 JOSEPH GLAZER, et al., SUA SPONTE REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE 11 Defendants. RELATED Re: Dkt. No. 2 12

13 14 Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva, pro se, has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause 15 having been shown, that application is GRANTED. 16 As Drevaleva acknowledges in her complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, 17 her claims arise from essentially the same facts as a number of other cases she has filed, all of 18 which were assigned to the Honorable William Alsup based on his determination that they were 19 related cases. The Ninth Circuit recently issued a memorandum opinion remanding one of those 20 cases (which was assigned case number 18-cv-03748-WHA in this Court) for further proceedings, 21 although a mandate has not yet issued. See Drevaleva v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, __ F. App’x 22 __, No. 19-16395, 2020 WL 6778779 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 2020). This case is therefore 23 REFERRED sua sponte under Civil Local Rule 3-12(c) to Judge Alsup to determine whether it is 24 related to case number 18-cv-03748-WHA and the other cases related to that case.1 Any party 25

26 1 The other cases are Drevaleva v. United States, No. 19-cv-01454-WHA (N.D. Cal.); Drevaleva v. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, No. 19-cv-02665-WHA (N.D. Cal.); Drevaleva v. Dep’t of 27 Veterans Affairs, No. 19-cv-05927-WHA (N.D. Cal.); Drevaleva v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, No. ] may file a response supporting or opposing finding the cases related no later than January 29, 2 |} 2021. See Civ. L.R. 3-12(c), 3-12(e), 7-11(b). 3 Issues of the sufficiency of the complaint for the purpose of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 4 || service of process will be resolved after determination of whether the cases are related. 5 IT ISSO ORDERED. 6 || Dated: January 25, 2021 7 c ao J PH C. SPERO 8 ief Magistrate Judge 9 10 1]

Oo 15

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TATYANA DREVALEVA, Case No. 21-cv-00500-JCS Also Filed in Case No. 18-cv-03748-WHA Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 9 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

10 JOSEPH GLAZER, et al., SUA SPONTE REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE 11 Defendants. RELATED Re: Dkt. No. 2 12

13 14 Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva, pro se, has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause 15 having been shown, that application is GRANTED. 16 As Drevaleva acknowledges in her complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, 17 her claims arise from essentially the same facts as a number of other cases she has filed, all of 18 which were assigned to the Honorable William Alsup based on his determination that they were 19 related cases. The Ninth Circuit recently issued a memorandum opinion remanding one of those 20 cases (which was assigned case number 18-cv-03748-WHA in this Court) for further proceedings, 21 although a mandate has not yet issued. See Drevaleva v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, __ F. App’x 22 __, No. 19-16395, 2020 WL 6778779 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 2020). This case is therefore 23 REFERRED sua sponte under Civil Local Rule 3-12(c) to Judge Alsup to determine whether it is 24 related to case number 18-cv-03748-WHA and the other cases related to that case.1 Any party 25

26 1 The other cases are Drevaleva v. United States, No. 19-cv-01454-WHA (N.D. Cal.); Drevaleva v. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, No. 19-cv-02665-WHA (N.D. Cal.); Drevaleva v. Dep’t of 27 Veterans Affairs, No. 19-cv-05927-WHA (N.D. Cal.); Drevaleva v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, No. ] may file a response supporting or opposing finding the cases related no later than January 29, 2 |} 2021. See Civ. L.R. 3-12(c), 3-12(e), 7-11(b). 3 Issues of the sufficiency of the complaint for the purpose of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 4 || service of process will be resolved after determination of whether the cases are related. 5 IT ISSO ORDERED. 6 || Dated: January 25, 2021 7 c ao J PH C. SPERO 8 ief Magistrate Judge 9 10 1]

Oo 15

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drevaleva-v-us-department-of-veterans-affairs-cand-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack