Drevaleva v. McDonough

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA Case No. 22-cv-00887-JST DREVALEVA, 8 wo. Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO 9 y FILE REPLY 10 Re: ECF No. 41 DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, et al., 11 Defendants. a 12

& 13 The Court grants Plaintiff Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva’s motion to extend the deadline

S to file her reply from June 13, 2022 to June 20, 2022. ECF No. 41. 15 Plaintiffs request to file a reply brief of longer than 15 pages is denied.

16 Plaintiff states that she “cited numerous statutes in [her] Reply that [she] hadn’t cited in 17

[her] First Motion to Strike.” Jd. at 3. Plaintiff is reminded that the Court does not ordinarily 18 consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief. See Cardone v. Cnty. of Alameda, No. 19 19-cv-00221-JST, 2019 WL 7816822, at *3 n.4 (N.D. Cal. July 30, 2019). 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: June 15, 2022 22 3 JON S. TIGAR nited States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28