Drevaleva v. Alsup

N.D. California

Drevaleva v. Alsup

DecidedJanuary 4, 2022

Docket3:21-cv-05348

StatusUnknown

This text of Drevaleva v. Alsup (Drevaleva v. Alsup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drevaleva v. Alsup, (N.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA Case No. 21-cv-05348-CRB 9 DREVALEVA, Plaintiff, ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA 10 PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL Vv. 11 WILLIAM H. ALSUP, et al.,

Defendants. 2B The Ninth Circuit has referred this case back to this Court for the limited purpose of 14 determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal

is frivolous. See Referral Notice (dkt. 23). As noted in this Court’s prior orders, the lawsuit is 16 barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity. See Order Adopting R&R (dkt. 15); R&R (dkt. 7); 17 Burton v. Infinity Cap. Mgmt., 862 F.3d 740, 747 (9th Cir. 2017). Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva has Z 18 herself admitted that her allegations are “not supported by any piece of evidence.” Mot. to Vacate 19 (dkt. 17) at 5. The Court sees no basis for Drevaleva’s suit and concludes that the appeal is 20 frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Accordingly, in response to the Referral Notice, the Court 21 hereby REVOKES Drevaleva’s in forma pauperis status on appeal. 22 IT ISSO ORDERED. 23 Dated: January 4, 2022 24 CHARLES R. BREYER 95 United States District Judge 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA Case No. 21-cv-05348-CRB 9 DREVALEVA, Plaintiff, ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA 10 PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL Vv. 11 WILLIAM H. ALSUP, et al.,

Defendants. 2B The Ninth Circuit has referred this case back to this Court for the limited purpose of 14 determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal

is frivolous. See Referral Notice (dkt. 23). As noted in this Court’s prior orders, the lawsuit is 16 barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity. See Order Adopting R&R (dkt. 15); R&R (dkt. 7); 17 Burton v. Infinity Cap. Mgmt., 862 F.3d 740, 747 (9th Cir. 2017). Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva has Z 18 herself admitted that her allegations are “not supported by any piece of evidence.” Mot. to Vacate 19 (dkt. 17) at 5. The Court sees no basis for Drevaleva’s suit and concludes that the appeal is 20 frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Accordingly, in response to the Referral Notice, the Court 21 hereby REVOKES Drevaleva’s in forma pauperis status on appeal. 22 IT ISSO ORDERED. 23 Dated: January 4, 2022 24 CHARLES R. BREYER 95 United States District Judge 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Drevaleva v. Alsup, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drevaleva-v-alsup-cand-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack